I hit the post size limit from my paste of loaded modules, so here's the rest of my post.
i had a bunch of paragraphs going on about protected memory and application spaces and how inner space would breach these lines. i decided to drop it and not continue the thread, thereby giving you what you want.... continued discussion.

instead, i'll defer to the blues on the wow forums:
"I'd personally avoid this as it does appear to be very questionable." - Reythur [ link ]

inner space was caught up in the ban wave, and lax has stated that he had to give depositions to Blizzard attorneys. that's just about as bad as it gets without jail time or high fines.

i was multi-boxing with keyclone for over a year before i came to dual-boxing.com. the community is friendly and helpful. your responses are counter to that and come with the added bonus of pissing off Blizzard.

and for the record, i do not like the thought of you risking the multi-boxing community with your product.
1. That is a very nice quote for you to take out of context. The quote could be applied to anything, and you're not taking into account the fact that the thread he was posting on started and ended with incorrect information, which would mislead any reader, and this obviously contributed to his guarded response. Also, Reythur himself indicated on another thread started by Vyndree that OTHER GM's have a better understanding than he would. There was also a recent news article (I wish I could find it now) about a study showing that people will believe false rumors, even after the false information had been corrected by the author.

2. I indeed I had to give a deposition to a Blizzard attorney in November 2007. The reason I had to give that deposition is because I did business with MDY, the developer of Glider. Being deposed does not make you a criminal or anything of the sort, nor does it imply that you have done anything wrong. It means that you have information they are interested in. In a deposition they ask you questions that you are required to answer, unless your attorney tells you not to answer and has some valid reason. It is part of the legal process. As part of my deposition, they did ask me questions about Inner Space, as well as ISXWarden, and that gave them information that was probably useful to them in was unrelated to the Glider case. They did not insist to me at my deposition that I had done anything wrong.

3. "Inner Space was caught up in the ban wave" is misleading. Firstly, there have been many ban waves, most of which had nothing to do with Inner Space or people using it for whatever reason. Secondly, the bans were for ISXWoW and/or ISXWarden, not for Inner Space itself. ISXWoW and ISXWarden violate the Terms of Service, Inner Space does not. You would have to seek out and download ISXWoW and ISXWarden somewhere other than where you would get Inner Space. I do understand that you, and some others, do not discern a difference between Inner Space, ISXWarden, and/or ISXWoW. However, there is a difference, and people who do have a technical understanding, do in fact understand that difference. Blizzard is not stupid, and they are not quick to ban people -- these are their paying customers, who are doing nothing wrong, and banning is NOT something they take lightly. I am also 5-boxing with Inner Space, I pay for my WoW accounts with my own credit card, I use my real name and address, wouldn't you think I would be the first one they ban if they are so against Inner Space?

4. I would absolutely love for you to show any evidence that I am "pissing off Blizzard". I have been multi-boxing with my own products, and sharing them, since EverQuest 1, with my company being started with an audience of multi-boxers in 2004 -- I guess that gives me 4+ years of experience with technical support and development in multi-boxing software. I don't see where I am being unfriendly, or unhelpful -- I have been responding to completely unrelated threads with helpful information where I can give it. You on the other hand are spreading your clearly biased FUD about me and/or my product, and I am sharing facts and/or evidenced knowledge. All of my posts except those on unrelated threads have been defending myself against ridiculous claims like your own.

5. Great, thank you for your opinion. For the record, I do not like the thought of you spreading absolute FUD about my product. Do not speak about that which you do not know, which is just about everything you have said in this thread so far. I am not here talking shit about you or your product, and again I have attempted to be as respectful to you as possible, but the more you attack me, the more I can only show you the same level of respect I get from you.

I'm not asking you for continued discussion. I would prefer that you keep your FUD in your head, and not spread it on these forums. If you actually had a valid point on any of the above, there might be a discussion. As it stands, it's just you making random claims, and isn't much different from the other threads, and in fact nearly all of the points you think you are making have already been refuted in the other threads, so I'm just repeating myself. That is just one more big reason why I believe all you are trying to do is think with your wallet, because you feel threatened by my product's ability to outperform yours, especially considering that information came from a respected member of this community. In the end I will let my product speak for itself, I do not need to spread false information about yours.