Close
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Showing results 21 to 24 of 24
  1. #21

    Default

    I play 2 accounts at the same time I'm playing 2 accounts at the same time I'm playing a single account just like most everyone else. Totally legit!

  2. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 'Nicbennett',index.php?page=Thread&postID=162742#p ost162742
    Thanks for bumping this, I hadn't seen it. I'll have to bookmark it to send the naysayers to.
    That part of the interview is the reason I no longer bother with the naysayers. Sure, they will still whine and complain, but we have the final word from up top at Blizzard, and the reply is a direct response to the crybabies. Notice his wording? "I don't think I was any sort of criminal for doing it" and "we should enable them to do that and not slap their wrists for doing it." That's a slap at all the idiots who state that it's "illegal" or "against the ToS/EULA" or that "it's not right" or "unfair" or whatever other bullshit they can dream up. It also provides an answer to people who seem to think that Blizzard somehow didn't know about multiboxing and therefore they "didn't design the game for it" as if that somehow invalidates multiboxing. There is your lead designer, telling everyone that he did it before and that he feels it's a legitimate way to play the game.

    The only thing the whiners have left is the same excuse they've been using for a while now, ever since their arguments all fell apart under the weight of repeated blue responses. :cursing: "IT'S NOT RIGHT BECAUSE I SAID SO, AND I AM THE KING OF THE UNIVERSE!!!!" :cursing: That's pretty much what they fall back on these days. Why bother trying to reason with the delusional? They lost, it's over. I'm gonna go multibox.
    "Multibox : !! LOZERS !!" My multiboxing blog

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 'Tonuss',index.php?page=Thread&postID=162785#post1 62785
    ... didn't design the game for it ...
    It's odd that I didn't make that application from Kaplan's answer before you brought it up. Usually, (this is months ago when there was a whine every single day), I liked to mess with the forum trolls and ask them to prove WoW wasn't meant to be multiboxed. It resulted is lols galore.
    Basilikos
    Icecrown US Alliance

    Mixed Group of Unholy DeathKnight, Holy Priest, Elemental/Restoration Shaman, Arcane Mage, Balance/Restoration Druid
    Second Mixed group of Protection Paladin, Discipline Priest, Fire Mage, Affliction Warlock, Affliction Warlock

    5 Balance Druids - Shelved at 65
    Holy Priest and 4 Warlocks - Shelved at 71
    Protection Paladin and 4 Shadow Priests - Shelved at 60
    5 Elemental Shaman - Shelved at 60

  4. #24

    Default

    I'm almost more excited about many of the changes upcoming than I was for the expansion. For example>.Duel spec, not dismounting in water, improved BGs, and the class changes inc. I get bummed out every Tuesday when this current patch does not go live lol.

    This was a great interview btw 8)
    Currently 5 Boxing 5 Protection Paladins on Whisperwind Alliance
    The Power of Five!!! ( short video )

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 04-21-2009, 11:35 AM
  2. Jeff Dunham Achmed's "Jingle Bombs"
    By Zal in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-18-2008, 02:12 AM
  3. multiboxing? Yeah multiboxing! ;)
    By empeha in forum Screenshots and Digital Art
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-12-2007, 03:33 PM

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •