Quote Originally Posted by 'Lax',index.php?page=Thread&postID=136286#post1362 86
How is this NOT about semantics?
Clarification. From your responses, it wasn't clear whether you were agreeing or disagreeing with my standpoint, as many of your statements were largely circular.

So I simply laid out the facts I got from your ambiguous paragraph, and asked if that was indeed the point you were making.


As for whether or not you were involved with Glider -- I think my point is still the same. To the consumer, I would consider the owner of a company to be the representative of the company. You consider the legal seperation between your actions and your companies to be the defining factor. Thus my further information on why I believe that to be an incorrect assumption because the issue is with reputation -- not legality.

In any case, you inferred that "involvement" meant legal involvement. I intended no such inference.

However, as you say "you don't care" to change my opinion (or others who question your reliability) -- and I feel that is a critical error if that is your business model. Upkeep of yours, and your company's reputation and a emphasis on consumer trust should be an important goal for any company. But, in the end, that's your choice.


In any case, if you feel my point has been adequately made and don't care to change my opinion, I have no need to post anymore. Just don't follow up respond with any more questions and I won't need to answer.