Quote Originally Posted by 'Vyndree',index.php?page=Thread&postID=136277#post 136277
I didn't say that. Please read my original response.

LEGALLY, yes -- they are independent. But to the common consumer, anything with the name "Bill Gates" immediately implies a connection to Microsoft -- legally or not. To us (the consumers of your multiboxing product), the name "Innerspace" automatically gets associated with "Bot", regardless if it was Joe Thaler's legal action.

It's a reputation. It doesn't have to be legal. Reputations are very volatile creatures -- they're immeasurable, easy to ruin and hard to repair. And, I will repeat, you've been responsible for upkeeping your reputation and your company's reputation -- so you've earned the difficulty in proving to your consumers that you (and your company) are trustworthy.

I have highlighted the important word in my response for better clarity.
Alright, in that case, we don't need to keep on keeping on with this, because it has already been well established that I created Inner Space via Lavish Software, and that I separately created ISXWarden and that people have used the two together. The point I was making that you were quoting:
Firstly, I was never heavily involved in Glider. In 2006 I made a deal with MDY to provide him with protection from Warden. That is not Lavish Software, that is me individually, there is a difference and Lavish Software does not produce nor market Warden protection.
is that Lavish is not and was not "heavily involved in Glider". They were interested in technology that I created, and they paid me, not Lavish Software. Irregardless of whether it was Lavish or me individually, there was absolutely no "heavy involvement", period. If you want to perceive that as some sort of connection between my company and MDY go right ahead. But it is absolutely correct to say that Lavish Software does not produce nor market Warden protection. Because the company does not. Just like Microsoft would not be producing nor marketing Billybob.exe in my example. Are we done with that yet, because we're way off topic.