Quote Originally Posted by 'zanthor',index.php?page=Thread&postID=135952#post 135952
Quote Originally Posted by 'Vyndree',index.php?page=Thread&postID=135949#post 135949
POINT A: Innerspace has the capability of being a platform for bots.
As does C#, C++, AutoIT, AutoHotKey, etc.
Quote Originally Posted by 'Vyndree',index.php?page=Thread&postID=135949#post 135949
POINT B: A program does not have to have a legal struggle with Blizzard in order to be bannable from WoW
This applies to ANY 3rd party software including KeyClone.
Quote Originally Posted by 'Suvega',index.php?page=Thread&postID=135950#post1 35950
Because it doesn't live in the process space, and doesn't allow the read or change of memory, nor has it been associated with botting software for the past few years....
Doesn't live in the process space I'll give you, but for memory space it was requested in this thread (http://www.autohotkey.com/forum/topic2960.html) in 2004, and the guy says he had it working in there, I haven't checked for current support... and as far as associated with botting, the FIRST thing I thought when I saw AutoHotKey was "gee, isn't that used for fishing bots too?"
As I said, those are just points. No more, no less. The reader can make their own conclusions based off those points (as they are only meant to be true/false). My thoughts on AHK are very clear above.

I'm just outlining the major points of the argument that lead to a conclusion of "gray area". If something is "gray area", I don't use it.