Xpac=Boxing banned?

[Nmagrig]

lvl 1s

saying I am a fag ect

Their info on boxing being banned is about as concrete as the info they have on you being a fag etc. Don't give them a second thought

This is false. All boxers are fags making their info on that part concrete, but boxing getting banned isn't happening so their info there isn't concrete.

BTW my source for our fagness is mostly from level 1s who studied the subject instead of leveling up into the double digits. At least thats the only logical explanation as to how they know so much while being that low of a level.

I'd have loved it if nmagrig replied and said "btw I'm gay.", just for the irony.



Actually I did say I was indeed gay and how did you know. However, upon sending my first reponse came the "multifrfagg is ignoring you" bit. But he kept on talking to me even though I couldnt talk back lol.

[Nomak]

The RAF program and mutli-person mounts almost scream for people to try out multi-boxing. As long as you are not using illegal programs, etc. I see no reason why this will ever change. I wouldn't worry about it...let them hate!

[Vyndree]

It's a shame that so many players believe a rumor without verifying its source.

QFT.


Your first words to such antagonistic words should be: "SS OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN".


I'll bet money on the fact that they can't show you any proof to back up their claims. If Blizzard wanted to ban us, they'd tell us -- and you'd be sure you'd read it all over dual-boxing.com if it were true.

[Thulos]

I think we should give people really messed up titles that show up under their name on forum posts if they post unconfirmed rumors! Something big and flashy would be best. :thumbsup:

[Ughmahedhurtz]

[quote='Thulos',index.php?page=Thread&postID=132614 #post132614]I think we should give people really messed up titles that show up under their name on forum posts if they post unconfirmed rumors! Something big and flashy would be best. :thumbsup:[/quote]I think I'd favor that. Especially when [url='http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=10972107286&postId=10970860251 7&sid=1#5']rumors of a multiboxing ban in WotLK have been proven false[/url] already.

[Zaelar]

If Blizzard wanted to ban us, they'd tell us -- and you'd be sure you'd read it all over dual-boxing.com if it were true.

We already see it all over here when it isn't true.

[mmcookies]

threads like this tickle me

[Ejercito de un hombre]

Even if multiboxing get prohibited by the new terms of EULA, all our fellows multiboxers would have their right to MB preserved, as they started mbxing when it was permitted. i don´t know how you name this situation in english, but its something like "adquired right".

So, no headache..

[Sarduci]

Even if multiboxing get prohibited by the new terms of EULA, all our fellows multiboxers would have their right to MB preserved, as they started mbxing when it was permitted. i don´t know how you name this situation in english, but its something like "adquired right".

So, no headache..

You do realize that you have no right to play the game? Blizzard allows you to play their game, and if you reject their EULA or TOS you are not allowed to play the game. You don't own the software, the characters, the items or access to the game. You play solely at Blizzard's discretion to allow you to play which they can revoke for any or no reason at any time.

Rights are not acquired just because you've done something before. If that was true, the first time someone committed a new crime they'd never be charged and since they did it before, they could continue to do so after there was a law against it. That would be insane.

[Vyndree]

If Blizzard wanted to ban us, they'd tell us -- and you'd be sure you'd read it all over dual-boxing.com if it were true.

We already see it all over here when it isn't true.

Yes, but when it's true it always comes with a source to cite.