I don't run 2 graphics cards, but at least with Vista 64, there is very little difference between running the windows across both monitors and just running them on one. And, overall, it's better than it was even running all the windows on one monitor under XP. Maybe a 32->64 difference.Originally Posted by 'Nitro',index.php?page=Thread&postID=131681#post13 1681
Moot point for me as horizontal span is not an option for my configuration.
I can't comment on 32, but on my machine with Vista 64, there is very little difference between running them all on one monitor and spreading them across two. There was a HUGE increase in multi-monitor PiP switching speed if you are using keyclone and having problems in that area.Originally Posted by 'sofakng',index.php?page=Thread&postID=131856#post 131856
If you aren't going to run > 4G, then yeah, 64 might not be worth it. However, I can tell you that a) 64-bit vista has been working just fine for me, not just in multiboxing wow, but with all kinds of other games and applications, and b) RAM is so cheap now, I'd get vista 64 and upgrade your RAM to 8G if you m/b supports it. It made a nice difference for me in places like shat because of the disk caching.Originally Posted by 'sofakng',index.php?page=Thread&postID=131993#post 131993
Connect With Us