Quote Originally Posted by 'Dominian',index.php?page=Thread&postID=125049#pos t125049

Now go and 5 box your way to 2k rating and tell me how manny teams attacked tried to nuke your prot warrior.. Maybe some actually did before they bothered to look you up on the armory.
First of all: I don't like arenas. I only do them to get some 'free' points. Arenas too boring to me. I don't like the constant need of queue'ing, I don't like how gear makes such a difference and I don't like to fight in the confined space every time. I'm a caster, so I don't like pillers neither.

My startpost doesn't even mention arenas, it only mentions battlegrounds.
But I agree that in arenas it's not likely that the warrior is the first target, because arenas are usually much better organized(voice chat and all that).

Bgs arent worth mentioning as the welfare epics brought in crap pve players ruining the fun for every pvper who used to enjoy bgs.
So do you think that arenas don't contain 'crap PvE players'?
And why are 'crap PvE players' ruining the battlegrounds? Do you mean that those opponents aren't challenging enough?

Have you ever fought in blue gear against full merciless teams(e.g. +300spelldmg versus a +1000spelldmg team)? It's practically impossible to win from them, unless you have a completely braindead team in front of you. By giving the good arena players better gear and not giving a stick to the other players wouldn't be fair, because the better opponent doesn't only have more skill but also much better gear which makes it almost impossible to even touch him, let alone killing him.

Also, I think calling batleground epics "welfare epics" is elitist and derogatory.