PvE protection warrior is very viable as PvP main

[Trammel]

I hope that before the next time you decide to create a thread, proclaiming that you have knowledge of something (and potentially misleading others) that you actually learn what the hell you're talking about first.

[Ken]

I hope that before the next time you decide to create a thread, proclaiming that you have knowledge of something (and potentially misleading others) that you actually learn what the hell you're talking about first.

Thanks for the suggestion, I didn't realize that yet!

[shockernub]

I hope that before the next time you decide to create a thread, proclaiming that you have knowledge of something (and potentially misleading others) that you actually learn what the hell you're talking about first.

You sir, are a meanie :thumbdown: X(

To the OP, enjoy your warrior pvp shouts/taunts if they make you feel better :thumbsup:

[Dominian]

Faced 4 shamans and 1 warrior in the arena today but im not sure if he controlled all 5 or just the shamans. He outgeared me by far...

his team http://eu.wowarmory.com/team-info.xm...I&select=ONAGI
My team doesnt show up since i made it today: http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-sh...azzak&n=Anilia

But i got pretty much the same gear apart from 3 pices of the blue pvp gear, with EM+CL he one shotted my main but i managed to ress and win over him even if he used aoe fear.

[merujo]

That's Jezperr, he control's 4 shamans. Welcome to the Misery battlegroup, we should meet sometime :P
soz 4 offtopic.

[shaeman]

I hope that before the next time you decide to create a thread, proclaiming that you have knowledge of something (and potentially misleading others) that you actually learn what the hell you're talking about first.

He made one mistake. The rest of the information was accurate and based on his findings. I see no reason for your aggression towards him.

[mphuie]

I hope that before the next time you decide to create a thread, proclaiming that you have knowledge of something (and potentially misleading others) that you actually learn what the hell you're talking about first.

He made one mistake. The rest of the information was accurate and based on his findings. I see no reason for your aggression towards him.

I wouldn't say its accurate. If you came up to a Warrior w/ shield and 4 Shammies, you've gotta be pretty stupid to start whacking on the Warrior. It's pretty silly to assume that since hes in front (by 2 yards?) that most people will attack him only.

[Jaws5]

I hope that before the next time you decide to create a thread, proclaiming that you have knowledge of something (and potentially misleading others) that you actually learn what the hell you're talking about first.

He made one mistake. The rest of the information was accurate and based on his findings. I see no reason for your aggression towards him.

I wouldn't say its accurate. If you came up to a Warrior w/ shield and 4 Shammies, you've gotta be pretty stupid to start whacking on the Warrior. It's pretty silly to assume that since hes in front (by 2 yards?) that most people will attack him only.

I hope that before the next time you decide to create a thread, proclaiming that you have knowledge of something (and potentially misleading others) that you actually learn what the hell you're talking about first.

He made one mistake. The rest of the information was accurate and based on his findings. I see no reason for your aggression towards him.

I wouldn't say its accurate. If you came up to a Warrior w/ shield and 4 Shammies, you've gotta be pretty stupid to start whacking on the Warrior. It's pretty silly to assume that since hes in front (by 2 yards?) that most people will attack him only.

First of all I run 1 War (main) 3 mages 1 holy priest. once they find out leader of your 5 man team they target it every time. If your l.ead has 20k armor and 15k heath and can deal with mages and casters a close range , you are better off. I will run with a Paladin in same grp. For pvp I prefer war in grp. PVE pal in grp.

Any one that pvps with 5 man knows that leader is always attacked first because he is in range first. hunters, range casters) :0

[Ken]

I hope that before the next time you decide to create a thread, proclaiming that you have knowledge of something (and potentially misleading others) that you actually learn what the hell you're talking about first.

He made one mistake. The rest of the information was accurate and based on his findings. I see no reason for your aggression towards him.

I wouldn't say its accurate. If you came up to a Warrior w/ shield and 4 Shammies, you've gotta be pretty stupid to start whacking on the Warrior. It's pretty silly to assume that since hes in front (by 2 yards?) that most people will attack him only.

I wasn't claiming that it was accurate, that's why I didn't add anything to the wiki pages and decided to open a topic about it to get more input.
I can only talk from my experience, and that is that mostly my main gets attacked. Close-combat attacks are generally on one of the shamans(probably because melee classes know the difference between cloth and plate better :P), but most people don't dare to close-combat me because most are dead before they get to doing so. So, from experience it's accurate to say that opponents mostly attack my leader.

On the other hand, if they don't attack my warrior, it is also a benefit, since I can more easily micro-manage everything because I don't have to switch to another character as quickly. So either way it's a win.

you've gotta be pretty stupid to start whacking on the Warrior

Many people in battlegrounds *are* pretty clueless, but it's true that melee classes seem to tend to target the shamans more than they target the warrior.
"OMG he's AFK! Report him!" while you're on defense is one of my favorites, especially when you're the only one who captured and held a flag for the entire game.

[Dominian]

I hope that before the next time you decide to create a thread, proclaiming that you have knowledge of something (and potentially misleading others) that you actually learn what the hell you're talking about first.

He made one mistake. The rest of the information was accurate and based on his findings. I see no reason for your aggression towards him.

I wouldn't say its accurate. If you came up to a Warrior w/ shield and 4 Shammies, you've gotta be pretty stupid to start whacking on the Warrior. It's pretty silly to assume that since hes in front (by 2 yards?) that most people will attack him only.

I wasn't claiming that it was accurate, that's why I didn't add anything to the wiki pages and decided to open a topic about it to get more input.
I can only talk from my experience, and that is that mostly my main gets attacked. Close-combat attacks are generally on one of the shamans(probably because melee classes know the difference between cloth and plate better :P), but most people don't dare to close-combat me because most are dead before they get to doing so. So, from experience it's accurate to say that opponents mostly attack my leader.

On the other hand, if they don't attack my warrior, it is also a benefit, since I can more easily micro-manage everything because I don't have to switch to another character as quickly. So either way it's a win.

you've gotta be pretty stupid to start whacking on the Warrior

Many people in battlegrounds *are* pretty clueless, but it's true that melee classes seem to tend to target the shamans more than they target the warrior.
"OMG he's AFK! Report him!" while you're on defense is one of my favorites, especially when you're the only one who captured and held a flag for the entire game.

If your talking about battlegrounds everything is possible because 9/10 in a bg have no clue about teamplay or simply dont care..

Now go and 5 box your way to 2k rating and tell me how manny teams attacked tried to nuke your prot warrior.. Maybe some actually did before they bothered to look you up on the armory.

Bgs arent worth mentioning as the welfare epics brought in crap pve players ruining the fun for every pvper who used to enjoy bgs.