Quote Originally Posted by 'Mac',index.php?page=Thread&postID=107988#post1079 88
Quote Originally Posted by 'Suvega',index.php?page=Thread&postID=107975#post1 07975
I'd really pick a druid over a pally.

BC = pally
WOTLK = Druid.
I'm not sure I'm following your logic. All we have read around here for a while has been pali > druid because of consecrate gather up the mobs, ez mode multiboxing tankage. Your suggesting the opposite.

What are you seeing about druid tanks in wotlk makes them any better at this point?
The other half of my post :P

]
Quote Originally Posted by 'Suvega',index.php?page=Thread&postID=107975#post1 07975
Remember, a seduce breaks for 2 seconds and it's ontop of a consecrate owning your paladin.

And YES it will OWN your paladin when you're wearing all blue quest gear in a WOTLK instance. You will NOT have badge gear to cover your ass
Pallies are uber for shaman rigth now, becuase you're wearing BT level tanking gear (ilvl 146?! badge gear), and tanking instances which were tuned for ilvl 115 blue gear. Of course it's easy to tank 5 mobs.

When wrath comes out, you'll be in blue quest gear, and mobs will OWN you if they were desgined to be CC'ed. You can't overgear an instance in WOTLK when it releases.
Therefore the ability to CC and tank 2/3 targets effectively without uber gear is valuable. Druids can do this vastly superior to pallies.