Quote Originally Posted by 'Thodoros',index.php?page=Thread&postID=101931#pos t101931
Im still bunch confused ?( but im getting annoying with much questions shit. Thanks for any help anyways
Shops will usually always try to get you to spend the most money on the newest high-end gear - there's a much higher profit margin for them.

Everything puppychow and entropic said is true - there shouldn't be anything confusing about it. The numbers are arbitrary, but this is how you should look at it: What's the difference between 80 (q6600 systems we're suggesting) and 200 (qx9650, gtx280x2) fps in WoW? Your monitor *can't* display more fps than it's Hz - usually 60 or 72 for LCDs. Definitely not worth the major price hike it's taking to do this. My previous post lists all the great bang-for-the-buck parts that will give perfectly fine fps for 5-boxing WoW.

Whoever is telling you no 64bit OS will "see" more than 4GB is full of shit. Simple as that. I use nearly all of 16GB on a Vista 64 machine at work on a daily basis for building massive terrain databases (think the entire world polygons of WoW multiplied by about 1000x). I *know* we're using that much memory (sside from the fact that the system resources show ~14.5GB free) since our terrain compiler would crash with out-of-memory errors 5% into compilation. Now it completes successfully overnight.