Curious about 2v2 so I tried it

[pinotnoir]

Well I tried 2v2 with shamans and it sucked balls. I won a few games but anything with a druid or rogue was near impossible. If anyone ever gets the urge to try 2v2 shamans save your gold and time. Unless you feel like being spam cycloned or cc'ed constantly its not worth it.

[shockernub]

...Unless you feel like being spam cycloned or cc'ed constantly its not worth it.

That there is funny, made me think of the issues I was having in 5s when a rogue blinded my main, it really hosed me up for a bit, they need to be considerate and only blind clones, sheesh.

[Charm4sho]

2 shammies aint so good in my opinion, do you got enough burst dmg to instant kill someone? in 5vs5 its better since people normaly multi box 4-5 shammies = loads of burst dmg

would be nice to see someone try duel boxing mages in 2vs2 that could work

[Farleito]

The advantage of boxing (particularly shaman) is the focused burst damage. If you can't burn someone down in "one shot", you will not be successful in the arena.

My advice for fighting rogues...Invest the Insignia of the Horde/Alliance and stay ghost wolf near the spawn points for the stealth detection. When they jump out at you, pop the trinket and lay down some fire nova totems and poison clensing totems. Stay away from pillars so the other person can't LoS and FF on them. This will only help you beat the crappy teams.

IMO, dual boxing is a disadvantage for PvP unless it's 2v1.

[xtobbenx]

I still think that 2x BM hunters should totaly own in 2v2.