Of the examples you mention, the only one that was beknownst to me was the zolo trick. In any case folks can still go to zolo and fight him just like they did before the last patch, so THAT wouldn't be exploiting. (although who would want to?). By defination you can't exploit something that has been "fixed", (at least if it's been fixed correctly).Originally Posted by 'Vyndree',index.php?page=Thread&postID=96466#post9 6466
Before the change, as you have said, it wasn't exploiting.
Wasn't then, isn't now.
If I see something that I consider zolo like (pre patch), I will avoid it. I would, as you are doing, encourage others to avoid it as well. Of course it is foolish to knowingly raise the ire of those who have power over you, just as it's ignorant to do so unknowingly.
But that's just a matter of my personal comfort level.
What I don't feel comfortable wih is calling all things zolo-like exploitive. That's not my pejorative, and not, I think, yours either. After all, how like zolo does something have to be? Or, say, if someone were to find at after the 15th totem, the skellies start giving xp again, would it be an exploit to take advantage of that? Would that be a bug, or would it be exactly the "fix" that Blizzard intended?
I will hush on this topic now.
Knobley
Connect With Us