Moving this where it belongs, my apologies.
Printable View
Moving this where it belongs, my apologies.
It's a pretty general discussion about multiboxing.
Why is it in the wrong section? :P
I'd rather go for 4 shaman, if that's an option. But 2 shaman and 1 mage as a 3 combo seems well interesting. Slightly more pve focused perhaps.
If you're more interested in pvp. I'd go 3 shaman, easier to manage in pvp.
At level 20, your shammies will get ghost wolf. I suspect your mage would be about as welcome as a fart in a space suit once that happens. That's certainly the case with my shaman group's paladin.
In a larger group where shammies are less dominant (Paladin/Shaman/Shaman/Mage/Priest perhaps) then this would be less noticeable.
That is more a convenience matter though. Once you reach level 40, it is fixed again. :p
I'd go with three shammies. The mage will give you some CC and counterspell and a bit of AoE but those can be adjusted for.
lolQuote:
Originally Posted by 'Maz',index.php?page=Thread&postID=67899#post67899
As a practical matter, a lot depends on your setup. If you're running 3 separate boxes (as I do), you'd be fine with a mage, since you'll likely be controlling all 3 separately. Sheep, water, counterspell, buffs and portability are very nice additions. The run speed will suck for 20 levels, but that should be a small percentage of the overall levelling process. Besides, the ports at 40+ will more than make up for the inconvenience.
If you're driving all 3 on the same box, I'd go with Shamans due to better keystroke/macro synergy and lower overhead.
Edit: typo
All I know is that I get QQ in some BGs... they whine and complain...
They are not QQ that I'm 5-boxing... they QQ that I'm boxing with 3 mages instead of 3x shamans.
*sigh*
(something to think about) :wacko:
Yes... this happened twice... from different people, different days..Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Fursphere',index.php?page=Thread&postID=68088#pos t68088
Here's how the conversation would go in BG chat.
1. Damn... a botter!
2. Nah, they're 3-boxing
1. Oh ok... 3 Mages though?
3. Shamans would've owned
2. Yeah, Shamans FTW
4. I would've picked Shamans for the multiple chain lightnings
2. And then the chain heals
5. Damn... we're losing because of those mages
3. Could've won with shamans.
me. <...>
it made me cry a little inside... :S
And just so you know... my faction always loses AB.
HAHA! Now that's some funny commentary right there.
Hey guys, thanks for the replies. I was going to put this in the newbie area since I honestly thought of being flammed for not searching or thinking :( but I'm really happy you replied anyway :D
I did make the choice on my own to go with 3 shaman for pritty much all of your reasons, mobility, usefullness, and even the pvp comment.
Going with the names Rofls (leader) RoflW RoflX RoflY RoflZ
my buddies we're nice enough to let me use their stuff so im a happy 5 boxer.
Now my only problem is finder a comfortable way to split the CPU usage on my computers... One of them can't handle more than two and the other runs a hot processor :S planning on turning the Graphics down when I get on again.
Thanks again for the tips and i'll be sure to check in now and then to be part of this awesome community you have goin on. Funny thing is i've been looking here and reading things but never taking part in anything, good to see a warm welcome :) :rolleyes: