Quote:
DPS specs have a priority order for optimal performance, developed and tested by the smartest fucks in WoW. Claiming otherwise is like saying the moon doesn't exist.
That is very true. I am coming to agree with you that my dps is lacking (50,000 dps), even though I had close to 100percent uptime on pyroblast and mage bomb. Still I got the job done, if I optimize for Nalak then I am less effective in pvp or for other encounters. But l will agree my dps is poor. But again because no one uploads to world of logs I have nothing to compare to as far as other boxers go, of course a single boxer is going to have more dps then I will (still they should not have 5 or 10 times more though).
Still if you are using fall through cast sequence macros that’s questionable.
Maybe I will do a macro to maximize dps on a target dummy just to show that longer step ones are superior.
Quote:
there are plenty of classes/specs who can perform on par if not better with your mages
But I have a real tank, real healers and real dps, not 2nd best or 3rd best.
Quote:
time devoted does not equal skill in my book, to get 540 ilevel you have to do harder content than you have to do for ilevel 510
So any high end raider is more skillful then you are?
Quote:
So you invented multiboxing? -_-
Well people did have two computers and move from keyboard to keyboard to have two characters in the game under their control but I was the first to hook two computers to one keyboard so in a way ya I did invent multiboxing with one keyboard.
http://samdeathwalker.com/forum/atta...6&d=1293362813
Quote:
So because people haven't recorded anything or recorded logs, you just assume they are talking out of their asses? Well not everyone feels the need to get confirmation from the community and need to see proof to be credible.
My apologies if I am skeptical of claims without any proof at all to back them up.