RE: they keep saying bliz doesn't design content for or against boxing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Catamer',index.php?page=Thread&postID=154192#post 154192
they keep telling me that the content wasn't designed for or against multiboxers however I have to disagree.
the base engine that everything is (or was) based off of has always included /assist /follow /focus ( focus includes target through ).
To have these items removed from the game required effort by Bliz. You don't remove these major items without effort.
everyone has known that Bliz could easily end multiboxing by removing any combination of the /assist /follow /focus
the loss of follow while changing zones is not really a problem to me but I do have issue with the massive amounts of "mount" quests where the game doesn't work like used to.
The solo boxer will never notice the loss, it's completely transparent to the solo player.
There doesn't seem to be any point to this loss other than to be anti-boxing.
I'm still having fun so far because I just do my best to avoid these quests or get really miffed because the quest now takes 5x as long as it should have.
We shall see when I get to the higher level content how much fun I have.
The simple explanation about why follow isn't working in vehicles is because they don't technically count as your character. Your character is still there, but not targetable anymore. When you go to follow, the game won't let you because follow is ALWAYS just a picky mechanic. Follow breaking under totally normal circumstances is nothing new to anyone. It's no stretch to imagine that without any changes whatsoever, follow would not work properly when you're phased out in limbo inside a vehicle. I doubt it has anything to do with multiboxing. The issue is that Blizzard doesn't care to program things that work for boxers. They stick follow and such things in the game for other reasons. These functionalities have never been designed to be resilient solutions to movement. They are just sort of there. Blizzard allows multiboxing, they don't and never have catered to it or cared one way or another.
This is the same fallacy as people saying that the RAF program was put in FOR multiboxers. Anything that helps us wasn't put in for us. Anything that hurts us wasn't put in to hurt us. It is what it is.