CSM 10 Canidate Watch - Who is for and who is against our gameplay

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pinotnoir

The OP needs to add Ryan Farmern to the list for multiboxers. I guarantee he is more supportive of multiboxing than anyone on the list. He runs what was once a multiboxing corp.

---

copy, ill track down his thread and also send him the list of questions.

Quote:

---

From: Tora Bushido
Sent: 2015.02.26 13:44
To: ShadowandLight


After listening to the "Open Comms Show" I've changed my mind. I think you are correct to say that there are many other ways people have an advantage on the other players (plex, websites, etc). Input Duplication and other tools are just one of them. If you want to ban one, you should ban them all. And since I do not want to nerf Eve to death, I rather keep them all.


Tora

---

Re: http://show.gamingradio.net/2015/02/...-not-dead-yet/
(Conversation starts around 1h 45m?)

Ryan's response on multiboxing ... I'm not sure he's the best candidate for MB'ers to rally around...

Quote:

---

Yes I do support multiboxing.


However, the broken part of multiboxing is overuse of combat.


If you want a mining fleet, you should be able to jetcan, assist drones, dock/undock without worrying about a ban.


But doing bombing runs (or any other pvp) or breaking the economy running incursions should be not allowed when using IS Boxer, everything else I think is fine.

---

Quote:

---

breaking the economy running incursions

---

[Citation Needed]

As for bombing waves, how many times do we have to tell these guys that THE BOMBER-BOXERS THEMSELVES SAID THAT DEFENSIVE BUBBLES ARE THEIR #1 ENEMY??? They said right on the forums that defensive bubbles will make them not bomb.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shadowandlight

Ryan's response on multiboxing ... I'm not sure he's the best candidate for MB'ers to rally around...

---

I asked him about it. Guess he had a change of heart or he is trying to do politics. I really don't know. I am going to take a break from the game because of the changes. It's just not fun being so restricted on what I can and cannot do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bugme143

[Citation Needed]

As for bombing waves, how many times do we have to tell these guys that THE BOMBER-BOXERS THEMSELVES SAID THAT DEFENSIVE BUBBLES ARE THEIR #1 ENEMY??? They said right on the forums that defensive bubbles will make them not bomb.

---

ISboxer is great at exacerbating the problem areas within the game. The problem isn't multiboxing incursions and bombers, but the game mechanics themselves.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EaTCarbS

ISboxer is great at exacerbating the problem areas within the game. The problem isn't multiboxing incursions and bombers, but the game mechanics themselves.

---

I'd buy that for a dollar if people (corebloodbrother) would talk about the game mechanics themselves and try to fix them instead of finding a scapegoat with which to pin everything on.

I'm curious to know if these people like Commander Aze know that it's easy to be your own fleet even without isboxer.

It's like these people never played in the olden days before these tools were produced.

So CoreBloodBrothers is a CSM. It doesn't look good for multiboxers.

well sadly no one we wanted on the CSM made it, but with 75 candidates and the power of large voting blocs made that a huge challenge to being with.

Here's the candidates who made it

https://i.imgur.com/0qkEyxe.jpg

That all said and done, there are a few people I know for sure are either indifferent or in-favor of multiboxing (Sion being probably the most prominent of that group).