Myers-Briggs Personality Type

i am usually INFP.

I did a little more reading on this and as it turns out, there are varying degrees of each indicator. Mine (fluctuates by mood): I (66%) N (55-60%) T (76-100%) J (100%). I actually think I agree with those tests and the varying results I've got since I tend to see the value in a little bit of variance in my own life. What I'd like to know now is if the other (just picking one as an example) 33% of the "I" is actually "E" or not.

ENTJ for me.

Extraverted = 22%
Intuitive = 38%
Thinking = 50%
Judging = 22%

edited for %s

I'm INXx, the last two dichotomies change depending on my environment and personal mood.
big X is pretty evenly split
small x tends slightly towards P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 'Basilikos',index.php?page=Thread&postID=183935#po st183935

I did a little more reading on this and as it turns out, there are varying degrees of each indicator. Mine (fluctuates by mood): I (66%) N (55-60%) T (76-100%) J (100%). I actually think I agree with those tests and the varying results I've got since I tend to see the value in a little bit of variance in my own life. What I'd like to know now is if the other (just picking one as an example) 33% of the "I" is actually "E" or not.

---

yea.. i think putting people into 16 different categories based on four different variables with each variable having only two values is a bit simplified. but im sure its simplified for a reason. for all intensive purposes though, the categories do their jobs well.

INTJ

Famous people of your particular type:
Isaac Newton, Niels Bohr, C. G. Jung, Michel de Montaigne, Michel Nostradamus, Ada Lovelace


Rut roh :whistling:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 'elsegundo',index.php?page=Thread&postID=183976#po st183976

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 'Basilikos',index.php?page=Thread&postID=183935#po st183935

I did a little more reading on this and as it turns out, there are varying degrees of each indicator. Mine (fluctuates by mood): I (66%) N (55-60%) T (76-100%) J (100%). I actually think I agree with those tests and the varying results I've got since I tend to see the value in a little bit of variance in my own life. What I'd like to know now is if the other (just picking one as an example) 33% of the "I" is actually "E" or not.

---

yea.. i think putting people into 16 different categories based on four different variables with each variable having only two values is a bit simplified. but im sure its simplified for a reason. for all intensive purposes though, the categories do their jobs well.

---

Yes, the original MB definition used dichotomies for establishing classification and following the "omg everything has to be classified" ideology of its time.

Subsequent refinements, especially business batteries, usually give a spectrum score.

Still, other batteries attempt to describe people who get vastly different results from MB at different times. Usually one or two dichotomies stay static, and the other two vary.

ESFP. Florence Littauer's Personality Plus is awesome as well. I tend to like it better than Meyer's-Briggs.

INTJ

It says I'm smarter than you but that I'll let you think you're smarter than me because I'm lazy.

I am an ENTJ.

My mother did a lot of research and personality analyzation when I was much younger so this is something I've known for a while. Very interesting stuff...