i dont think it will happen even if it does were planning on going to wildstar.
i dont think it will happen even if it does were planning on going to wildstar.
far as i understand it will not be boxable at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by harvan
There is word that it will be:Quote:
Originally Posted by ebony
http://isboxer.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=24709#p24709
It's anyone's guess as to how difficult it will be or if it will be frowned upon.
Since it looks like follow and assist are in.. im sure it will be boxable..also.. the healers heals are large circles or cones in front of them.. but I think it should be easy enough to make sure the healer is facing the tank/group for those types of heals. I was going to try this game anyway.. but if its boxable ( and permitted ) that will be that much better.
oh i don't go is boxer forums much. and IS2 is soon™ so i did not think it support 64bit annytime.Quote:
Originally Posted by MiRai
2nd i got told follow is not in game but that is kinda funny how u can follow npc/pets etc thats asking for s**t in my eyes and i can see it getting removed fast. The other thing would be ITW/CTM i like in wow if there is anything like that could make thing a little harder but it might work.
Maybe its just me but i have no Faith in any new mmo's i given up looking at them getting my hopes it be somthing epic for it to turn into what the others have,
I don't see how well you could play a game that requires aiming to hit with your attacks?
Its not precision aiming like a true action game.. its more directional/area of effect type.. and you can lock on to targets ( you can /follow players or mobs ) SO im guessing if your aiming ( as you put it ) at a target with your lead toon.. your other toons will be aiming at the same target.. or close to it. ( just guessing based on available info..might not work at all..we wont know until someone multiboxes it I guess )Quote:
Originally Posted by Multibocks
Asheron's Call you had to aim any ranged attacks. It kind of tried to auto lead a target but arrows and spells missed all the time. It also allowed for the ability to manually dodge incoming attacks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Multibocks
this me or did this go off topic so fast...
this was a wow TOS fight to a wildstar can be boxed game?
CONFUSED!
I knew something is coming- My accounts are inactive for about 20 days+ only 1 account is active, I just sit and wait and see what's gonna happen. I think that one day, follow will be removed. I have no problem to stop multiboxing and leaving WoW for good if something will change and involve to dump more money- by switching battle net accounts and moving chars around.
I don't think a lawyer would accept a case like that on a contingency basis. If you sue Blizzard because they closed your bnet account the best you could hope for is to get the account reinstated. To get anything else you would need to prove damages. Either is unlikely because a judge would probably dismiss the case before you finished explaining what you were suing for. And then your lawyer walks away with a percentage of the zero dollars you "won." I can't imagine that there's a lawyer out there who would go through the trouble of starting a class action to get a bunch of gamers their WOW back, for the same reason.Quote:
Originally Posted by MadMilitia
On the other hand, I am sure that there are plenty of lawyers willing to charge a person $400 to write an angry letter to Blizzard on their behalf and another $400 to write a letter back telling them that Blizzard refused to restore the account.
That said, the CYA language in those TOS agreements really shouldn't be allowed, even if it is just an access agreement for a video game. "You agree that we can do whatever we want, for whatever reason we want"? Who do they think they are, the NFL?
In before Virtual switching and sub-netting to get around this issue guide.
This is a TOS-Compliant community and there is a no tolerance policy here when it comes to discussing ways to circumvent a game's rules.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bradster
Subnetting and Virtualization is a common industry standard configuration.Quote:
Originally Posted by Khatovar
What I took from this change was to provide a better load/performance. This would be the best bet to ensure a smooth transition over paying for two Internet Service Providers.
Unless I skimmed over any official post, identifying the change outside of that reason there would be no conflict of interest and a happy medium for all parties.
I'll be honest, I don't know exactly where you're going with this, but...Quote:
Originally Posted by Bradster
Blizzard knows how many World of Warcraft and Diablo III licenses can be attached to a single BNet account, so if Blizzard was to enforce the "3 BNet account rule," then they'd immediately know that anyone multiboxing more 24 characters in World of Warcraft or more than 3 characters in Diablo III, would automatically need to be looked into.
No amount of virtual switching or sub-netting is going to get around that.
I think the issue isn't targeted towards boxers. Perhaps an issue with Bnet account management. Appears its ok to have Multiple Bnet accounts.
http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/forum/to...1650625?page=1
You have to forgive me on "BattleNet" That came after my time, its been six years since I've played the game. You had to have a separate account for each back then. Not how that all works now now that Battle-net is part of it. But looks like that is still ok for those worried. Could end up having to pay for transfers to other accounts, perhaps they will provide that free with the change. Least be the right thing to do.
I doubt it's targeted at multiboxers as well, but no one knows why it's there except for Blizzard and they've yet to say why.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bradster
That thread is from early 2013. The recent change that is being discussed in this thread doesn't take effect until next month.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bradster
You're allowed to play the "old guy" card once. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Bradster
What if your old enough that you forgot you used it? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by MiRai
Well, memory is the second thing to go... :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Bradster
A doctor's note will need to be provided.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bradster
Update: replay from legal at blizzard.com
The restriction is related to Battle.net ((Balance)), and that the text in the EULA will be revised in the future such that players may only have Battle.net Balance on no more than three accounts, but there will not be a restriction in the EULA on how many accounts a player can have.
So nothing to worry about. move along.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethlan
First to go is your wife, 2nd is what you had on 1, and 3rd is your memory.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonuss
lolQuote:
Originally Posted by ebony
Tons of people still use separate bnets, if youre not interested in mounts or pets or heirlooms it arguably ideal. Especially if you do PTR (since its one PTR account per BNET) and the get Diablo for free per battlenet was nice if you are into that game.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shodokan
I don't think people hate prepared, he is a troll, but he is harmless and fun.