Printable View
I haven't had any problems at all with mages mana with my paladin's blessings. Mages are also simple which is a big bonus. WMM instead of WWM is what I chose. That lets me go destruct-spec warlock, and go heavy DD spells.
I have been toying with the idea to lose the second mage for a leather/mail class to not waste so many drops. Hunter or balance druid... but I think I've nixed that idea, for now.
my group is well into end game with quite a few 115 blues. the mages have the 30% + 30% regen going for them which is huge. while i woulndt run without a lock, the summon and SS are just too useful, the warlock is very much OOM compared to the mages. They can go through several trash pulls without drinking and with a gem, mana isnt an issue on boss fights. I have the warlock as destro and set to shadowbolt spam on trash, and maybe a curse of the elements and corruption on a boss. never tried affliction. i pretty much use the imp full time or the voidwalker when needed. seduction is a pain in the ass and the succy ends up dead, I have not found the auto recast to work helpfully at all. any pet set to non passive usually ends up dead also. the warlock CC is ok, great in Botanica, but pretty high maintenence. I have a dps spam key which is the heart of my play style (space bar!) and for me to CC or something means the entire group has to stop DPS or deal with GCD on the lock (either with /stopcasting or manually). So basically I wouldnt trade a mage for another lock. What I would consider if i started again was a pally tank. Aoe works through lower instances with a warrior but not at 70.
Uhhhhhh....whut?Quote:
Originally Posted by Brabazz