Well, I got banned today, good-bye 4 mages, and mains. (Non Dual-Boxing Ban)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 'mlwhitt',index.php?page=Thread&postID=42945#post4 2945

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 'Taipan',index.php?page=Thread&postID=42939#post42 939

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 'Anahka',index.php?page=Thread&postID=42564#post42 564

FYI: http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/th...sid=1&pageNo=1

---

Hum...

Am I misreading (not being a native english speaker) or the immediate response from the Greenie Palehoof to the OP still brings back some uncertainty for software-based multi-boxers ?

I quote :
"In fairness, one player operating more than one character on more than one computer is not, so far as I know, a bannable offense.
The 3rd party software or hardware many people use to do so, however, is. "

Note : not sure how official is a Greenie vs a Blue statement by Blizz rules.

/salute

---

Greenies are just people that volunteer to help be hall monitors so to speak. I would never take their word the same was a blue. Pretty much Greenies are just people that Blizzard has a little extra faith in making valid postings, but I wouldn't place anything they say as being completely valid. I would ALWAYS go with what blue(s) say.

---

QFT additionally I guess the misunderstanding, if that is the right word to use, comes from the fact that the OP is talking about 3rd party software. I assume the greenie believed him to actually be referring to 3rd party software (automating software), whereas the OP was intentionally trying to slander Mboxing by saying keyclone (non-automating software) is 3rd party software that automates..
I don't think the greenie meant to say anything other, just got tied up in the OPs misrepresentation

I've noticed that the OP is a flamer.. he instigates and flames in several posts.



edit: clairification.. the OP from the wow forums that was referenced earlier.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 'bugilt',index.php?page=Thread&postID=42946#post42 946

Players in the barrens seem to fit into 4 categories.

1. I'm jealous of you and there for hate you. Chuck Norris Rocks!
2. OMG, how do you do that? (let me ask 100 questions.) wait!
3. I've seen it before, that is pro.
4. I'm to lagged out to see you.

---

LOL... I don't think it's limited to Barrens. :rolleyes:

To be honest I think the reason why is you have already been suspended once. Players with a history are watched, seeing something out of the norm, their not going to be open minded. Just hey look this isn’t right look what he’s up to now! *whack with the ban stick.

Look at some of the 3rd party program user forums such as popular bot programs, there’s a pretty distinct track record for them getting baned for something stupid on there new account after being banded before, or in your case suspended once.


Not the answer you want to hear, but something to consider as a possibility

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 'zanthor',index.php?page=Thread&postID=42831#post4 2831

As far as bypassing the GCD - I spam arcane explosion, arcane missiles, pretty much any of the dps keys I have on my mages/priests like I'm having a siezure... I'd be curious to see how blizzard differentiated this from a macro set to repeat every 25ms since the time between the server getting this would be skewed by latency...

---

Because they don't check it server side. You have a nice little monitoring tool sitting right on your PC called Warden.

EDIT: And they could be monitoring it through your client as well pretty easily.

Still waiting on an email from Blizz ?

Still no update? Im curious whats up.

Well it seems like the guy died? I didn't know Blizz was that harsh :P

Still no response. I'm guessing the guy was doing something shady and may be embarrassed to admit what it was.

I originally thought he was one of the wow forum flamers setting up the post here to fuel the fires there, but his (non dual-boxing ban) kind of killed that idea. :thumbdown:

I'm gonna force this thread to die now.

Please PM me or any member of staff if you have an issue.

Regards.