There is actually a very large precedence for exactly this, actually taken even a step further. Microsoft would sell Windows to a computer manufacturer to install on the computers they built and sold to the end users. As a computer manufacturer you could also purchase access to Windows APIs and developer kits. You could then make improvements to Windows as you saw fit. However, you were REQUIRED to provide those changes back to Microsoft at no cost. You were also not allowed to charge your customers extra for those improvements you made. In early versions of Windows, large portions of the core technology were not written by Microsoft at all. They were written by engineers at places like Compaq and HP who had to give them to Microsoft, who then gave them to their competitors like Dell and Gateway that did not have internal development teams.Quote:
Section 1 of the new policy is simply anti-competitive and well beyond the scope of what any company has power to dictate. It will hurt the community in the long run - fuck it's already hurt the community as members such as Cogwheel have already pulled up camp and left.
So using Microsoft as an example for anything related to fair business practices or as a way licenses software is not really the best example.
Would it be considered an Advertisement to put a link to the developer's website for "the latest news updates" about their addon? Then put a big ass donation button on that page.