[quote='Eteocles',index.php?page=Thread&postID=5936 6#post59366]As usual I'm gonna request a copy/paste of the OP and any funny replies since SOME of us at work can't troll the wow forums like other lucky workers ;)[/quote]The Blue poster (Slorkuz) linked back to Belfaire's response to Vyndree's famous post:
"
[list][*][b]2. Re: Multiboxing, rules, and semantics[/b] | 03/11/2008 10:58:27 PM PDT[/list]
[list][url='http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=5288579356&sid=1&pageNo=2#23']http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/im...blizz-post.gif[/url]http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/im...ote-button.gifhttp://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/im...ply-button.gif[/list]
Quote:
Q u o t e:
Semantics issue #1:
Is using one keyboard to send signals to multiple instances of WoW automation? In other words, what is the definition of automation as it applies to WoW?
Using a keyboard setup like what you're describing? Not automation.
Setting up a macro with said keyboard that would, for example, automatically press Fireball each time it was available? Automation.
Quote:
Q u o t e:
Semantics issue #2:
Software (such as Keyclone, Octopus, etc) to emulate a keyboard multiboxing solution is, by nature, "3rd party". Is "3rd party software" synonymous with "bot" or "automation"? Are all types of "3rd party software" bannable?
Likewise, hardware, by nature, is "3rd party". What kinds (or uses) of 3rd party hardware are bannable?
Is it sending an identical signal to all client windows or switching between them to send commands? Not automation.
Is it playing the game for you, or rather, for one of your client windows? Automation.
All hardware is considered neutral as long as its commands and features are not being used to automate gameplay.
Quote:
Q u o t e:
Semantics issue #3:
Does multiboxing give a player an in-game advantage?
Yes--and so does grouping.
Quote:
Q u o t e:
Therefore, can multiboxing be considered an exploit?
No. We consider it be an alternative playstyle; not everyone can do it, but if a person is willing to devote the concentration and capital to such a venture--legitimately--we're perfectly fine with it. Five multiboxed accounts can be feared and CCed just like five solo accounts.
Quote:
Q u o t e:
Semantics issue #4:
Multiboxing can be considered by some as "against the spirit of the game" or, at least, "against the spirit of the game the way I want to play it". Is multiboxing against the "spirit of the game"?
See above.
Quote:
Q u o t e:
Semantics issue #5:
Multiboxers provide Blizzard with a significant amount of extra income, and that, and only that, is the reason why is it currently allowed. True/false?
Patently false. All accounts should be allowed to be played as they see fit provided that they're playing within our policies. In cases of mulitboxing, all accounts involved are playing the same as any other account, only simultaneously.
Quote:
Q u o t e:
Semantics issue #6:
Multiboxing is only allowed because there is no reliable way for Blizzard to find, identify, and catch them. True/false?
Almostly hilariously false.
Quote:
Q u o t e:
Unrelated issue #7:
Cake or death?
I'll have the cake, please. [ Post edited by Belfaire ]"