Corebloodbrother mentioned that the CSM pressured CCP into banning input broadcasting. I've looked at the CSM and they have zero experience with ISBoxers other than "wah my fleet that was AFK on a planet got bombed".
Printable View
Corebloodbrother mentioned that the CSM pressured CCP into banning input broadcasting. I've looked at the CSM and they have zero experience with ISBoxers other than "wah my fleet that was AFK on a planet got bombed".
sauce?
http://community.eveonline.com/news/.../csm-9-review/Quote:
Originally Posted by EaTCarbS
ctrl + F > ISBox
e: additionally, it could probably be argued that cbb has a vested interest in banning ISBoxer as a prominent member of a nullsec alliance without looking at other alternatives of balancing the game.
So, inference rather than evidence?
Worst case, this person misrepresented the "will of the people" as it were. I'd be kinda surprised if CCP didn't have ways to verify that. Negotiating in bad faith would seem to be an insta-ban from CSM positions. Then again, if the CSM's view of the "will of the people" is basically all the forum crybabies, then they probably see ISBoxer as the next Black Plague. /shrug
Precisely my point.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ughmahedhurtz
For example
https://forums.eveonline.com/default...97#post5444797
In the eyes of at least one CSM having more then one account is now an "unfair advantage"...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBgeCZW3upgQuote:
Originally Posted by Tool of Society
So on the off chance that he'd read it. I sent Corebloodbrother a mail asking for a sit down in a neutral place either here or in-game to talk about why he pushed CCP, or a simple response. Gonna see what he says.
i tried, so far hes dodged me as well as any other CSM i've tried talking toQuote:
Originally Posted by bugme143
well, not all of us dodge
m