Yet another bliz response to a QQer
http://blue.mmo-champion.com/topic/1...he-multiboxing
Printable View
Yet another bliz response to a QQer
http://blue.mmo-champion.com/topic/1...he-multiboxing
I took it on myself to reply...
http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/forum/to...8257?page=2#27
Translation: "It's still allowed. Stop whining. Also, if you can't get enough people together to defeat a multiboxer, how the hell do you expect to defeat a half-decent normal team?"
I don't have an EU account, but if you feel like posting a bit more...
They guy going off about it should be illegal because it is third party software... might be interested in learning that Windows and their mouse drivers are also third party software.
All these threads are kind of funny, and probably not worth the time to reply to them; but still fun to see what they say as they get riled up with your calm responses.
Heh yeah, I saw it on the other site so thought I'd repost it here! Quite a gag to read :D
Those posts can be rather fun.
haha :D
Boy I love these threads.
These are like "tacklin' fuel".
I am close and soon I will be "that" guy in PVP who has 5 pallies all wearing 6 pieces of heirloom gear. leveling capped at 69 and just boxing even HARDER than the last game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Movie, The Christmas Story
At least the blue post hit it on the head that we can't take evasive action as well as individual players ....
It's funny, though, how you have basically three standard arguments from the multiboxing haters:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam DeathWalker
- Blizzard is making too much money from it to ban it.
- They're impossible to kill.
- They're easy to kill: just kill the lead guy and they all stop.
1 = "...vanishingly small minority that multibox..." = INVALID
2 = Obviously not, or multiboxers would be topping all the arena ratings. = INVALID
3 = Unless you're using any FTL-type setup where leader swaps are either instant or fairly quick and painless. = INVALID
The first two are so stupidly obvious as to be unworthy of rebuttal. The third is obviously false, but I'm OK with letting them stew in their own ignorance. ;)
Regardless, anti-boxers are so completely irrational in their arguments that it defies belief.