Printable View
Hey, I recently started dual-boxing again and was wondering what combo would be the best.
I thought that Pally, Mage, Priest would be a decent team, but I was wondering what you guys thought :)
Also, I need help with a quesmacros for my guys, last night it took me an hour to reach level 2 T.T
No best combo, it depends on what you want to play yourself.
Lies
Welcome to the Forums!!!!
Defently not a best class, just a best class for you.
Okay, well what would be easisest then, but didn't have three of one class.
I've dabbled in DUal boxing and tri-boxing so it's sort of a new thing for me.
Which in yalls opinion would be easiest to level to 70, and to control?
I'm currently running a priest, hunter and mage but I'm thinking of thinking about swapping the hunter or mage for a paly. Picking a team is like picking a single character class and depends on what you enjoy playing. I would suggest looking at the wiki page for classes and decide which columns are most important to you and pick classes based on that.
It depends on what your goals are. If you want to minimize the need for grouping, you want all the DPS you can get. If you want to make grouping easy, you want a tank/healer/dps combo like you have, then just pug 2x dps. If you want to PvP, get versatile classes, so you can be flexible.
And don't discount multiple of the same class. It's an easy mentality to have, you are just 2-3-4-5x as strong as you would be alone.
Easiest? 3 Shaman. You have everything, dps, buffs, and healing. That's why there's so many shaman teams.Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Deathpower',index.php?page=Thread&postID=100829#p ost100829
Hardest? 3 different classes. It's not impossible, but it's a lot more work, it requires more creativity and research to work out key combos and macros. But, it's all pretty easy in the starting levels, so you can learn as you level.
I'm toying with a pally/2x shaman team, next. I have two 30 shaman that need a buddy.
I'd swap a druid in instead of the priest, for the extra DPS, to back up the pally. If the Pally goes down or loses aggro, the priest and mage are dead. Mages are super-squishy, they die a LOT, and they grab aggro like mad, because they do so much damage. Priests just die if a mob looks at them.
With a druid, you could set up macros to open with Roots, while the mage Pyros, and the Pally charges. Nuke until dead. The druid can also tank if the pally goes down, plus you get mark of the wild.
That's just my two cents, worth about as much. I just think priests are too high-maintenance, especially if you're just starting out. maybe in a 5 man team you can just pull one along for heals, but in a 3 man, I want my characters being as efficient as possible, and a druid brings a whole lot more to the table, even if it's a balance druid or a resto druid. I could be totally wrong, but I just don't think priests bring that much to the table, unless it's a 5 man.