CCP: "Hyperdunking takes skill and intelligence." Does ISBoxing not?

[bugme143]

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5439216#post5439216 for those interested.

[shadowandlight]

theres at least a few dev's who are on our side regarding ISBoxer / Multiboxing / Input Duplication etc.

It seems though whoever is leading the charge against it in CCP has won for now.

Reading inbetween the lines of CCP Falcons comments on the GRN show (which seemed positive towards multiboxing) and taking into account he said he'd be happier if it was 1 person - 1 pilot when he posted the new ID policy, I am further confused as to who that person within CCP is who is on the warpath against us.

[Mosg2]

My impression is that the CSM were strongarming CCP to make the changes. I suspect that the primary driver is the nulsec and sovereignty changes on the horizon and the impact that ISBoxer mining fleets and bombing fleets distort their plans.

[bugme143]

My impression is that the CSM were strongarming CCP to make the changes. I suspect that the primary driver is the nulsec and sovereignty changes on the horizon and the impact that ISBoxer mining fleets and bombing fleets distort their plans.

The funny part is, Shadowandlight showed CCP that the bombing wings are still viable, and mining was never heavily invested in straight broadcasting anyway.

Bubbles are the #1 preventative (besides never undocking) to bombers. One of the bomber boxers even said so in the thread.

And these people going on about mining fleets act like the Catalyst and Talos aren't a thing...

[EaTCarbS]

...CCP Falcons ... he said he'd be happier if it was 1 person - 1 pilot...

CCP promotes power of 2 special.

CCP makes it take literal years to max out SP efficiency.

CCP adds space coffins to the game.

CCP logic.

[thedevilyouknow]

CCP Falcon no understand business model

[bugme143]

1407
http://puu.sh/ffW3J.png
Industrial character admitting he uses out-of-game tools.