PDA

View Full Version : Yet more WCradio Multi-boxing opinions...Coming Soon



Eteocles
03-28-2008, 08:58 AM
Just started listening to the WoWInsider show ep30...right off the bat they mention multiboxing and I perk up, turning it up...seems their next show will most likely be about multiboxing. The host already states though, "I don't think it's how the game is supposed to be played, it's should be one toon one person" so we're gonna have quite a bit of drama coming from the next show probably :p

I'm sure Zin is familiar with WoWInsider being less than amicable or caring about us, hence where that one line in my karaoke parody came from as well(Though they HAVE done a few articles on us), so this should be an interesting show :p They seem to air on Saturdays same and Octale & Hordrak so said show should come on tomorrow, most likely in the afternoon or evening, they don't have a time posted on their show page.

Most likely I'll keep an eye on the irc and make a reply here when the show's on if I manage to catch it in time, if not the archive'll always be up eventually :p

Ellay
03-28-2008, 09:02 AM
Ya WoWinsider has quite a bit of biased against us, which is kind of odd because every article they produce concerned dual-boxing generates quite a bit of traffic for them. Either way someone must of squashed his character and it's been a personal vendetta ever since! :)

Vyndree
03-28-2008, 01:32 PM
Ya WoWinsider has quite a bit of biased against us, which is kind of odd because every article they produce concerned dual-boxing generates quite a bit of traffic for them. Either way someone must of squashed his character and it's been a personal vendetta ever since! :)

I blame Xzin for most of the WoWinsider tip-offs. They only really publish anything multiboxing related when it's something REALLY major.

I have to admit, WoWinsider is how I found out about Xzin which is how I found out about his wiki page on WoWwiki which is how I came here. So it's good for something. WoWinsider's content has really started to suck recently -- their writers are running out of interesting content (perhaps because they're being biased about what they'd like to write about?).

yarr
03-28-2008, 01:53 PM
"I don't think it's how the game is supposed to be played, it's should be one toon one person"

does this remind anyone of Bush?

marvein
03-28-2008, 02:10 PM
"I don't think it's how the game is supposed to be played, it's should be one toon one person"

does this remind anyone of Bush?

it reminds me of the o-boards. but with less QQ and swearing

Ughmahedhurtz
03-28-2008, 02:59 PM
"I don't think it's how the game is supposed to be played, it's should be one toon one person"

does this remind anyone of Bush?I'm not sure I get your reference, but if this is some political statement, please keep that shit to the off-topic forums.

Xar
03-28-2008, 08:32 PM
Ya WoWinsider has quite a bit of biased against us, which is kind of odd because every article they produce concerned dual-boxing generates quite a bit of traffic for them. Either way someone must of squashed his character and it's been a personal vendetta ever since! :)

I blame Xzin for most of the WoWinsider tip-offs. They only really publish anything multiboxing related when it's something REALLY major.

I have to admit, WoWinsider is how I found out about Xzin which is how I found out about his wiki page on WoWwiki which is how I came here. So it's good for something. WoWinsider's content has really started to suck recently -- their writers are running out of interesting content (perhaps because they're being biased about what they'd like to write about?).Hehe, wowinsider is how I got here and into multi-boxing (more than just having my priest follow me using synergy). It was their article of you and your BF :P doing Kara.

I nearly popped a cork this past Saturday when I heard him say that at the beginning of the live show. (was going to call him Shroom but I'll be nice).

I have to agree the articles haven't been nearly as informative and interesting lately (aside from the recent Sunwell info).