Log in

View Full Version : [WoW] Grant a level teams...



LionsFist
12-22-2009, 07:59 AM
I'm stuck with a bit of a conundrum...

When I created my RAF chain to start with, there was a nice little error involved on my behalf where I didn't get my main established account to refer the first line. As such, only 4 accounts are chained. This now leaves a problem with my extra RAF grant-level sets.

As I can only grant levels on 3 of my accounts, leaving my 4th one without a guy for that, I'm planning on going a group of 3 that will solely DPS together for instance farming, maybe raiding. Obviously getting into a raid as 3x ranged DPS would be a much more viable solution and a lot easier raiding time than trying to get into a raiding guild as 5x DPS or two roles combined.

On that note, I now have two teams past 60:
1. 4x shaman (prot pally and another shaman on main account to support)
2. Boomkin, ele shaman, destro lock and priest for healing (with prot pally to support from main account)

I have 4x paladins coming up soon, and 4x druids if I get time as my RAF runs out in about 2 weeks :(

I was leaning towards the idea of going 3x mages, as they're always hot, and if not first competitive DPS, at least up there... but I find their issue is a lot of waiting for procs (though it's anyones guess how this turns out in Cata). The other idea was 3x Warlocks, or even 3x Hunters.

Any suggestions and reasons for such?

alcattle
12-22-2009, 08:14 AM
since it has been this long, you have no recourse with Blizzard. Things happen, and you can just go forward. I would focus on getting teams to 60 first and formost, then use what levels you want. The options are keep two of the accounts, and redo two more RAF later. You end up with a Booster on the Main account and can level more on the four other toons.

LionsFist
12-22-2009, 08:27 AM
Oh I know that theres no recourse with Blizzard, it's not a bother anymore, just merely saying because of these facts, what do you think would be the best 3's combo for me to use my grant-a-level's on?