Log in

View Full Version : Upgrade time, assistance? How high do I need to go to survive dalaran?



Jheusse
05-14-2009, 01:56 PM
I'm not running my teams right now, but some recent hardware issues have caused me to look at upgrading some parts and making some swaps, and I'm keeping my teams in the back of my mind.

Current box, I ran 4 toons to 60 several times with this:

ASUS M2N-SLI Deluxe Motherboard
BFG GeForce 9800 GT OC 512 Card
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Windsor 2.8GHz S Dual-Core Processor Crucial 4
GB (2 x 2GB) DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel
XP Pro
2 160 GB 7200 RPM HD (both IDE drives, Seagates)
Running on a 22" widescreen Viewsonic monitor

Have been having some freezing issues, the screen would just lock, no artifacting, no apparent heat issues, I've blown the case out several times. I thought it might be a memory thing, as it seemed the longer I had gone since a reboot the more likely the freeze was, it also showed up the more windows I had open. I guessed I had a bad chip on one stick that only got accessed when I had a lot open or hadn't rebooted for a while. I planned to test it, but hadn't gotten it done, I generally started rebooting just before raiding time and it worked fine.

Then last week one of my hard drives flat disappears, it's not being recognized at all, ruined a night of raiding while I updated one of my installs on the other HD. Hmm I think, maybe that HD was dying. Then the system freezes again. Then 2 days after the "missing" missing hard drive is recognized normally and I can launch wow from my solo play folder.

Friend of mine has the same mobo, and we're thinking that's a likely culprit, so I'm starting my shopping, asking for recommendations or experiences with how much of a boost to expect from various upgrades.

Upgrades I'm considering, in order of importance, using some of anandtech's guides for input (he did a new one today http://www.anandtech.com/guides/showdoc.aspx?i=3563&p=2 ):
New mobo (ASRock A780GMH/128M maybe?)
Hard Drive (at a minimum get away from IDE, but 1 SATA, dual SATA, SSD?)
New processor (Probably Phenom II quad core, the new 45nm units)

I'm looking at AMD because of familiarity and longtime comfort with them, and I like that the newest CPUs are compatible with DDR2 and DDR3 so I can delay a memory update.
I'm not planning on going to Vista on this box, planning on making the jump to 64 bit and 8+ GB memory on the newer OS when it gets a little more mature
Not planning a video card upgrade at the moment, though I have set a budget aside if I need to update my PSU.

I don't overclock, I don't need massive HDs, the two 160s were half full, though I have multiple wow folders on both.

This is too long for a simple request for input on mobo/processor/HD upgrades, sorry.

Budget 2-300 bucks, likely newegg.

EaTCarbS
05-14-2009, 03:04 PM
I would definitely get a Quad Core processer, you will notice the difference :D

Upping to 6g or 8g of ram wouldn't hurt either.

Also, are you running the x32 bit version of XP, or the x64 bit?

Jheusse
05-14-2009, 04:15 PM
32 bit XP Pro. I realize that limits me to ~3.5G memory recognized.

Not really looking at going to a 64 bit right now, as that's primarily Vista, I'm kind of holding out to jump to 64 bit and the new Microsoft OS at the same time.

Crucial
05-14-2009, 05:20 PM
I have an AMD Quad Phenom 9950 black edition, 8 gigs ram @ 1066, Vista 64, raid 0 velociraptor drives, Nvidia 8800 GTS and with 5 clients I'm lucky to get 12-15 fps on my main in Dalaran with lowest settings on... it's brutal. Any other zone I get 60 fps main, 30 fps on clones no problem. CPU is maxed in Dalaran. Next system will definitely be an Intel...

Enndo
05-14-2009, 05:28 PM
Get an i7... You won't regret spending the money at all.

Edit- Windows 7 64bit is available for DL on microsofts website, free for 1 year.

Ughmahedhurtz
05-14-2009, 07:54 PM
To give you a feel for the differences in Dalaran. My alt (4-box) system was:
Core2Duo OC to 3.1GHz 4GB RAM (normal 1066 stuff, nothing spectacular) Your basic SATA-300 non-raid, non-high-performance model :PI was having issues in Dalaran. Alts would lag behind so bad I'd have to run 20 yards, stop for a second, run 20 yards, stop, repeat, etc. Real pain in the butt.

So, I swapped the Core2Duo out for a Q6600 2.4GHz OC to 3.1GHz and I don't have to wait for the alts any more. Granted, when I first get there, all my systems chug a bit from a bajillion alliance scrubs hopping around in circles in their raid purplez. Aside from that, no difference in graphics, motherboard or HDD. The CPU there really does help a ton.

MiRai
05-15-2009, 06:57 PM
Edit- Windows 7 64bit is available for DL on microsofts website, free for 1 year.True that! Well worth the upgrade.

wowphreak
05-15-2009, 08:28 PM
There are 2 main issue to solve in order to be able to run in dalaran lag free having enough memory and being able to load texture fast enough.

The memory issue can be minimized if yeh dont run at a super high rez with all affects minimized. I'm not sure what the cut off point is but if yeh want to play in high rez yeh have to have more memory which force yeh to go with a 64bit os I would say 6 gigs at minimum.

If yeh have enough memory or play at a low rez loading texture wont be that big of a deal it may cause some stuttering but wont be a game killer.
Having an ssd drive would reduce the stuttering.

Jheusse
05-16-2009, 12:58 AM
One idea I came up with was to set up a dual boot capability of XP Pro and the 64 bit windows 7, at least until I was comfortable with the new OS. Though I'm not really guru enough to pull that off without significant research, but free 7 for a year would be cool, could track down a cheap copy later.

Then it would make sense to go to 8 gigs of memory in addition to the mobo, processor, HD upgrade.

SSD drives don't appear to hit the capacity vs. cost that I think I would need, unless I kept it stripped down to bare essentials.

Ironically I also have a dual core laptop with vista 64, 4 GB of memory, and a 1 GB video card I could get into play, as well as an older box that was my main wow box at the beginning of 2008, just networking all of them and getting the configs set up is a beast. musical monitors is annoying.

Contemplating the following combo from newegg for 259, though my digging around shows this board may have some gremlins, stuttering display that can't be tracked down and debugged.
AMD Phenom II X4 940 Deneb 3.0GHz Socket AM2+ 125W Quad-Core Black Edition Processor Model HDZ940XCGIBOX - Retail
GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-UD4P AM3/AM2+/AM2 AMD 790X ATX AMD Motherboard - Retail

Something at that level of processor and price point is about where I'm aiming at this time.

I run my raiding main with high settings through one folder, and my multis on 2 HD with individual folders with all settings turned way down, and sound off on all but one.

Moving forward I'd probably have 1 symlinked folder for the 4 kids, and 1 folder for my raiding main, since he uses so many more addons.

Lax
05-16-2009, 12:20 PM
One idea I came up with was to set up a dual boot capability of XP Pro and the 64 bit windows 7, at least until I was comfortable with the new OS. Though I'm not really guru enough to pull that off without significant research, but free 7 for a year would be cool, could track down a cheap copy later. I was running XP 64-bit and decided to install Windows 7 on a separate hard drive in case I wanted to go back. I haven't yet. The performance difference is too great. I'm getting 30 FPS in dalaran at the moment with my 5 online at 1680x1050 resolution with lowest graphics settings, which is a big jump from 12-18 or so I was getting before. The lag in loading textures in Dalaran is also better (less time) than it was in XP. Oh, and I use 1 WoW folder, period, on a 7200 RPM SATA drive, sound on all of them. My personal opinion at this point is moving to Windows 7 from a previous one is probably a better upgrade than an SSD drive (loading times seem much faster on the same hardware), but that's just based on my experience and I haven't used an SSD drive myself.

Sam DeathWalker
05-16-2009, 01:30 PM
SSD drives on intel systems, even I7, is limited by the 2Gbit/sec "DMI" buss. AMD Hypertransport is 8Gbit/sec.


Thats why people don't get the vast improvment you would expect from SSD looking at the specs.

If Lax says Win 7 is the way to go that sounds good to me.

Starbuck_Jones
05-16-2009, 03:57 PM
Symlinking of folders did it for me. Dalran went from unplayable to running as smooth as anywhere else once I did that.

Jheusse
05-18-2009, 04:40 PM
Just ordered a Phenom II x4 945, adding in a new mobo and an SATA hard drive later today.

My plan at this point is to grab windows 7 RC1 before I do the build, I guess burn an image to a disk, could use a link to the steps to do that.

I plan to pull my existing hard drives out, clean install windows 7 to the new SATA, install and build it as the primary drive, then bring 1 or both of the old IDE drives back on for backup, at least long enough to scavenge files from them. Going to be slightly different than the typical OS upgrade, since it'll be on a clean HD, should be nerve wracking.

Then I guess it'll be time to go searching for The Idiots' Guide to Symlinking without Douching Anything Up.

Down the road I'll add in more memory, that's always an easy upgrade to do without generating wife aggro. Current memory is 4GB of DDR2-800, will have to decide whether to augment or replace it, don't know how much boost the 1066 stuff would be.

Drecan
05-18-2009, 05:17 PM
I'm running AMD 940 with 8 gigs ram @1066 but to tell you the truth i didn't really see a big difference from 800 to 1066

Jheusse
05-18-2009, 05:31 PM
Hmm, painted myself into a corner, bought the Phenom 945, went 35 bucks higher to get it, didn't want to go the extra 20 past that for the 955 since I don't overclock.

And now I'm not 100% certain this motherboard is compatible with it:
GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-UD4P AM3/AM2+/AM2 AMD 790X ATX AMD Motherboard - Retail

Most of the review comments concern running it with a 720, 940, or 955 successfully, as those are two bang for buck sweet spots and the pinnacle.

AMD's motherboard compatibility chart kicks out 2 AM3 board and a discontinued AM2+ board, but I don't know how up to date it is


Hmm looks like I'm ok
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Support/Motherboard/CPUSupport_Model.aspx?ProductID=3038

Thanks Drecan, I recall it used to be that pairing up different speeds it would run at the slower speed, but honestly I never was able to tell much difference. Total memory had greater impact for me than memory speed.

Drecan
05-18-2009, 06:50 PM
Thanks Drecan, I recall it used to be that pairing up different speeds it would run at the slower speed, but honestly I never was able to tell much difference. Total memory had greater impact for me than memory speed.yeah no problem and your right the only way you would even tell the difference with memory speed would be if you had a low amount of ram but if you have 4+gigs your not going to be able to tell, the only thing that you could tell would be on the CPU side of things for read/write

Jheusse
05-26-2009, 11:11 AM
My buddy that helps me build and I fought with the bloody thing for many hours, trying to isolate a potential bad memory chip, wondering if the new HD was faulty, constantly troubleshooting because it would consistently hang during setup.

I had mentioned BIOS updates early in this odyssey but both my buddy and I shy away from them as a rule. BIOS flashes have always scared the hell out of me, no matter how easy the manufacturer's literature claims it is, there's always risk.

Just as my buddy is starting to mention contact numbers for various tech support (has nearly exhausted his knowledge options), I revisit the compatibility chart on GIGABYTE's webpage, which lists the F4 BIOS under that specific processor for this board.

Then a scramble for a floppy drive starts going bad (I have like 1 in the house), until we read that you can do it with a USB flash drive, and I have those coming out my ears.

Flash to F4, crossing my fingers (did I mention it was a thunderstorm outside at the time?), then go back into the process.

Like friggin butter from that point on. Mobo drivers, updated nvidia drivers, AVG, the Windows 7 RC1 OS itself, none of them even gave us a whimper from that point on.

Long story but we got there, and my system does scream now. Now to learn the quirks of Windows 7 and decide which makes more sense on memory, add another 4 GB kit of crucial PC-6400 to what I have, or buy a new 8 GB kit of similar (4 sticks of 2 GB), because I can't spend that much more.

Then get my multibox on again.

Drecan
05-26-2009, 11:42 AM
lol i had that same issue on my Asus board -.- but all i had to do was kick start it with the mobo cd, stupid express gate software -.-

Moorea
05-29-2009, 03:35 PM
I play on 2 relatively cheap gateway laptops from last year; 1 with my main on max settings and 1 with 4 alts on min setting; since the most recent patch and having min settings I don't have follow/lag problems anymore in dalaran... so I don't think you need fancy hw for 5x

(I do have 4gb ram on each laptop though)

Starbuck_Jones
05-30-2009, 04:51 PM
PAE or Physical Address Extention is a fraud. For 99% of us who are useing desktop OS's. (not a server os) 32bit versions cap out at 4 gigs of ram. Less when you subtract memory that gets reservered by other hardware at post. Bios, CPU, Videoram etc. Most users will see anywhere from 3.8 to much much less. PAE is always on by default since like XP service pack 2 days. If you try to access the little bit that seems to be missing, Windows will use a page file to address it. So.. your pageing memory address to your hard drive to access additional ram. This is nothing more than a fancy page file you are already using. Its meerly a cosmetic fix so people quit calling tech support wanting to know why it says they have 3.8gigs of ram and not the 4gigs they paid for.

Unless you have a specific reason not to use a 64bit os. You should be useing a 64bit os. PAE will not address your memory issues. And it will not let you break the 4gig limitation for desktop OS's