supertux1
09-18-2008, 03:49 PM
Okay, so here's the situation:
I've been successfully 'multi-boxing' my 1pally 4shaman team from a dual core 2GB machine with one large LCD monitor (1920x1200) and one CRT (1600x1200) configured as dual displays.
The main pally is on the 1920x1200 and the other four shaman alts are in quadrants on the 1600x1200.
So, in celebration of hitting level 40, I put together another identical dual core 2GB machine and bought another 1920x1200 LCD monitor. The new machine has better video card.
So here are my options:
Option 1:
Resourcewise, I think it would be ideal to run two game clients on the first PC and three game clients on the newer better PC2.
That way every cpu core is being used, with one core running two clients. The PC that runs three clients would have an LCD and
a CRT, with the CRT running the main and the LCD divided in two running the alts. The PC that runs the two clients would have
just an LCD divided in two running the other two alts.
i guess it could look something like this:
PC1 PC2
A|A M A|A
LCD C LCD
Option 2:
Alternatively, I think the alts would be more 'synchronized' if all four of them ran on the same computer with each core
handling two game clients. One of the cores on the main goes unused. I wouldn't have to use the CRT, and that would
look like this:
PC1 PC2
M AAAA
LCD LCD
So what's the better option here? Should I go for utilizing all CPU power, or maybe sacrifice some display and efficiency for more in game 'synchronization'?
Right now, everything runs perfectly all on one machine, so I'm pretty sure either way would work, just wondering what is best ?
I've been successfully 'multi-boxing' my 1pally 4shaman team from a dual core 2GB machine with one large LCD monitor (1920x1200) and one CRT (1600x1200) configured as dual displays.
The main pally is on the 1920x1200 and the other four shaman alts are in quadrants on the 1600x1200.
So, in celebration of hitting level 40, I put together another identical dual core 2GB machine and bought another 1920x1200 LCD monitor. The new machine has better video card.
So here are my options:
Option 1:
Resourcewise, I think it would be ideal to run two game clients on the first PC and three game clients on the newer better PC2.
That way every cpu core is being used, with one core running two clients. The PC that runs three clients would have an LCD and
a CRT, with the CRT running the main and the LCD divided in two running the alts. The PC that runs the two clients would have
just an LCD divided in two running the other two alts.
i guess it could look something like this:
PC1 PC2
A|A M A|A
LCD C LCD
Option 2:
Alternatively, I think the alts would be more 'synchronized' if all four of them ran on the same computer with each core
handling two game clients. One of the cores on the main goes unused. I wouldn't have to use the CRT, and that would
look like this:
PC1 PC2
M AAAA
LCD LCD
So what's the better option here? Should I go for utilizing all CPU power, or maybe sacrifice some display and efficiency for more in game 'synchronization'?
Right now, everything runs perfectly all on one machine, so I'm pretty sure either way would work, just wondering what is best ?