View Full Version : Google Chrome (Beta)
bugilt
09-02-2008, 03:24 PM
Google Chrome (BETA) for Windows
Google Chrome is a browser that combines a minimal design with sophisticated technology to make the web faster, safer, and easier.
http://www.google.com/chrome
I've been using it for a few hours and it's great.
Anozireth
09-02-2008, 09:20 PM
I'm still scratching my head over the name. Firefox's internal resource handling system is also called Chrome. Seems they would have tried to pick something else ?(
Fizzler
09-02-2008, 11:39 PM
I will probably stay away from it. Google has become the other 800 pound gorilla. They are downplaying the browser experience with excuses on getting to the content quicker. They do not like noscript and the effect it has on their ad strategy and want more control over getting your browsing habits.
Ughmahedhurtz
09-03-2008, 12:51 AM
I will probably stay away from it. Google has become the other 800 pound gorilla. They are downplaying the browser experience with excuses on getting to the content quicker. They do not like noscript and the effect it has on their ad strategy and want more control over getting your browsing habits.Follow the money. :P I'm gonna give it a couple months, too. See what the pointy black hats come up with about it first.
bugilt
09-03-2008, 01:17 AM
I don't mind googles ad strategy. They are to be the only smart 800 pound gorilla I have seen.
Griznah
09-03-2008, 09:39 AM
www.opera.com ftw!
keyclone
09-03-2008, 12:49 PM
i still think it's funny that they think it's new.
the browser == today's vt100 terminal ... mainframer's unite!
don't look at me, i'm a desktop fan... windows/linux... and i thought we pretty much killed the concept of the mainframe in the late 80s/early 90s. today, people think everything must be in a browser. talk about a hammer seeing every problem as a nail...
bugilt
09-03-2008, 02:42 PM
I remember the days when I would dial up a BBS to DL some porn.
You might want to hold off on creating any content in chrome that you feel is important. If this is the route they plan on taking, I plan not to follow.
http://tapthehive.com/discuss/This_Post_Not_Made_In_Chrome_Google_s_EULA_Sucks
RobinGBrown
09-03-2008, 03:17 PM
Agreeing to the Chrome EULA would be careeer suicide for any professional artist, photographer, musician, or writer.
bugilt
09-03-2008, 04:35 PM
Agreeing to the Chrome EULA would be careeer suicide for any professional artist, photographer, musician, or writer.
It doesn't say anything you make. It says anything you make while using chrome.
Ughmahedhurtz
09-03-2008, 06:42 PM
I've been playing with this thing here at work for a few hours. A few observations from this morning's use of Chrome:
Cannot get the editor box to show up here, only the source code tab in the "Reply" window. Installing firefox addons or addon updates while Chrome is running = BAD. Causes the install/update to generate strange errors intermittently. WTF is Chrome doing to my firefox install? Middle-clicking links does open in new tabs but I can't get those new tabs to open in the foreground. No tab preferences options in Chrome that I can find. No way to disable javascripts that I deem suspicious or whitelist only the ones I know are valid. No ALT+shortcut menu options like nearly every other common Windows app. Google analytics javascript buried in every single image on every page on every site. Chrome ALT+mousewheel dynamic resize only affects text, where all other browsers resize images, too. The javascript popups on the wow armory are off the screen if you scroll down at all. VNBoards forums login page = fubar. Wierd problems with Firefox while Chrome is running (text boxes stop scrolling properly, etc.) Wierd problems with windows not repainting correctly in the titlebar/buttonbar areas, or repainting very slowly, especially with Word 2007/Outlook 2007. Windows doing crazy shit when dragging an email to the taskbar to attach to another email. Yahoo Mail's login page graphics are chopped in half.I've not noticed any realistic difference in page load times versus Firefox 3.0.2. Pages with large amounts of ads actually take longer to load and pages with Tribalfusion.com ads actually prevent you from clicking javascript-enabled links until they finish loading, which seems to indicate the javascript engine has some potential threading issues. I tried it on some of our intranet stuff like our Oracle front-end (notoriously broken again/fixed again with Firefox) and didn't see any issues.
My initial 2 copper... :P
Drakkun
09-03-2008, 08:15 PM
I am actually using 2 browsers now. I am using Chrome for a few websites that I use all day like Gmail, Google Calendar, Todoist, etc. These are websites with no ads (except Gmail) and are very secure/trusted. I am browsing the rest of the net with Firefox + No Script.
If you want to use Chrome without seeing all the ads, use a proxy like Privoxy ('http://www.privoxy.org') (freeware). Many of them have ad filter lists.
I am enjoying the simplicity of Chrome and look forward to its improvements. Hopefully it stays simple, yet powerful.
wowphreak
09-04-2008, 02:41 AM
Hey competition is always a good thing specially in the browser world.
It tend to lead to more innovating things considering the only time microsoft trys something new is when there forced to
Yagamoth
09-04-2008, 09:09 AM
www.opera.com ftw!
So true :D
Well, I can't say anything about Chrome. I'll probably simply wait until they made their final release.
vBulletin® v4.2.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.