Log in

View Full Version : [WoW] had the coolest fight earlier.



jdraughn
10-17-2007, 12:32 AM
I am playing my multiboxer guys, at the moment lvl 23 Blood Elf Palladin, and 4 lvl 23 Blood Elf Priests. I am on my way back to Tarren Mill and had been looking for some alliance to kill. They hadd all been really high levels who just go around ganking everyone but I never saw anyone my own lvl and I had been in that area for 3 days.

I see a hunter as I am going past the farm and think to myself, "finally, a lower lvl Alliance!", I press 1 which casts shadow word: pain and only 1 sticks. Then i realize he is a level ??. I figured what the hell, if one of my dots stuck then maybe I have a chance, so I went all out on him basically I just started spamming my 2 key, which is my mind flay key.

So with the talent that gives a 2% chance of stunning when casting a shadow spell (x 5 when talen is fully maxed) = 10% chance per priest for stunning (x 4 priests = 40% chance). So, I start spamming my mind flay key and about half the time one of my priests would actually get one to stick on him. Now about half the time one of those stuck on him he would get stunned.

So I am spamming my mind flay key, and occasionally I would try to throw on some shadow word: pains and low and behold I keep him stun locked to the point where I am getting his health down. I used hammer of justice on him once, which bought me a little time but meanwhile I am still spamming mind flay and would you belive it. I killed him. he managed to take out one of my priests and all my 4 other characters were at deaths door. I rezzed my priest and turned around to get the hell out of there and a ?? warrior comes up and starts one hitting all my guys one at a time, but we are all out of mana from the fight with the hunter.

So as I am running back to my corpse, I ask for help and a lvl 70 mage comes to rescue and kills the warrior and hunter. I ask him what lvl the hunter was and he was lvl 56!

My pallie and 4 priests who are all level 23 managed to take out a lvl 56 hunter. couldint believe. I had reached to start recording with fraps but didn't have it running. bummer, would have been cool to see again.

Xzin
10-17-2007, 01:15 AM
Very nice work :)

I used to kill level 60s @ level 40s in SM.... before they could zone back inside :)

unit187
10-17-2007, 04:01 AM
with my priest and 4xWarlock team I have met at 30 lvl ~56 lvl alliance warlock at Hillsbrad as well, after long fight I managed to kill him. That was my first really high level to kill :) I bet he was pissed off ^^

Zaelar
10-17-2007, 04:57 AM
Did he not have his pet out? I imagine his pet would've been tearing you up while you stunlocked him.

jdraughn
10-17-2007, 06:40 AM
Did he not have his pet out? I imagine his pet would've been tearing you up while you stunlocked him.

Yeah he did, but I don't think it ever attacked me. It was probably put on passive and he was probably too stunned (no pun intended) to see a bunch of lowbies attacking to put his pet back on defensive.

Nevron
10-22-2007, 02:36 AM
Just goes to show you why a game with an over-abundance of CC can't be taken seriously for PvP.

Ughmahedhurtz
10-22-2007, 03:01 AM
Killed this 70 hunter 5 times today on my 51 priest+locks group. The first time while he and his 55 buddy tried to gank me.

http://wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Magtheridon&n=Magthere

He killed my priest every time but that's the beauty of Soulstone. ;) And then when he got tired of me making him do corpse runs, he rode off down the road right into a 70 UD rogue, who proceeded to camp him. It was great.

The best part? I just respecced everything into felguards, so I only had insta-CoAgony...didn't even have instant corruption. :P

Slats
10-22-2007, 06:25 AM
How are you liking Felguard? :)

I play Felguard Spec with Latency my main before I started multiboxing. With good gear obtainable through PvP and Arena you are a monster to kill and dish out some serious damage.

My biggest gripe was never having a healer. :) And while AEboxes 5 Shamans got me into multiboxing... I'm so looking forward to my four warlocks and priest carving it up in battlegrounds.

jdraughn
10-22-2007, 07:04 AM
I had always thought about that and how cool it would be to do a bunch of warlocks with felguards andmake it so when you press a key it sends them after to attack someone one after another, a couple of seconds apart. Would keep them stun locked for the first 8 seconds or so. But that would require putting in pauses and that would be again'st the TOS. Sure your only sending 1 key stroke to each wow window with 1 key, but to have a pause before each one sounds like your asking for trouble.

beyond-tec
10-22-2007, 08:02 AM
I had always thought about that and how cool it would be to do a bunch of warlocks with felguards andmake it so when you press a key it sends them after to attack someone one after another, a couple of seconds apart. Would keep them stun locked for the first 8 seconds or so. But that would require putting in pauses and that would be again'st the TOS. Sure your only sending 1 key stroke to each wow window with 1 key, but to have a pause before each one sounds like your asking for trouble.

Warlock 1:/petattack,,,
Warlock 2:/petattack,,
Warlock 3:/petattack,
Warlock 4:/petattack

should work as a round-robin for pet attack.

hit the button, pet1 attacks, wait several seconds, hit the same button again, pet2 attacks ....

or just use the round-robin function from keyclone

Shogun
10-22-2007, 08:23 AM
Setup some macros especialy for that:
1: Sends pet 1, causes all locks to cast corruption and priest to VT/VE/SW: P
2: Sends pet 2, causes all locks to cast a curse and priest to VT/VE/SW: P
3: sends pet 3, causes all locks to cast immolate and priest to VT/VE/SW: P
4: you get the idea by now ;)

Would suck to be on the receiving end of that...

Djarid
10-22-2007, 02:23 PM
Warlock 1:/petattack,,,
Warlock 2:/petattack,,
Warlock 3:/petattack,
Warlock 4:/petattack

should work as a round-robin for pet attack.



surely that will make all 4 pets attack on the first keypress

1. 1,2,3,4 attack
1. 4 attack
2. 3,4 attack
3. 2,4 attack
4. 1,2,4 attack


you get the idea