Corebloodbrother mentioned that the CSM pressured CCP into banning input broadcasting. I've looked at the CSM and they have zero experience with ISBoxers other than "wah my fleet that was AFK on a planet got bombed".
Corebloodbrother mentioned that the CSM pressured CCP into banning input broadcasting. I've looked at the CSM and they have zero experience with ISBoxers other than "wah my fleet that was AFK on a planet got bombed".
Wanna earn your customer's respect? Go to bat for them. Defend them and what they do. Don't roll over on command, and don't punish them for being human beings. And no, this ain't aimed at CCP.
Keep pretending you care about EVE ISBoxers and not just their money, Lax.
Come hang out with us in the channel "Isboxers Lounge" and discuss fittings, doctrines, or just shoot the breeze. Unlike the forums, we won't ban you for what you say. IGN: "AayJay Crendraven" and "Nolak Ataru".
http://community.eveonline.com/news/.../csm-9-review/
ctrl + F > ISBox
e: additionally, it could probably be argued that cbb has a vested interest in banning ISBoxer as a prominent member of a nullsec alliance without looking at other alternatives of balancing the game.
Wanna earn your customer's respect? Go to bat for them. Defend them and what they do. Don't roll over on command, and don't punish them for being human beings. And no, this ain't aimed at CCP.
Keep pretending you care about EVE ISBoxers and not just their money, Lax.
Come hang out with us in the channel "Isboxers Lounge" and discuss fittings, doctrines, or just shoot the breeze. Unlike the forums, we won't ban you for what you say. IGN: "AayJay Crendraven" and "Nolak Ataru".
So, inference rather than evidence?
Worst case, this person misrepresented the "will of the people" as it were. I'd be kinda surprised if CCP didn't have ways to verify that. Negotiating in bad faith would seem to be an insta-ban from CSM positions. Then again, if the CSM's view of the "will of the people" is basically all the forum crybabies, then they probably see ISBoxer as the next Black Plague. /shrug
Now playing: WoW (Garona)
Wanna earn your customer's respect? Go to bat for them. Defend them and what they do. Don't roll over on command, and don't punish them for being human beings. And no, this ain't aimed at CCP.
Keep pretending you care about EVE ISBoxers and not just their money, Lax.
Come hang out with us in the channel "Isboxers Lounge" and discuss fittings, doctrines, or just shoot the breeze. Unlike the forums, we won't ban you for what you say. IGN: "AayJay Crendraven" and "Nolak Ataru".
For example
https://forums.eveonline.com/default...97#post5444797
In the eyes of at least one CSM having more then one account is now an "unfair advantage"...
Wanna earn your customer's respect? Go to bat for them. Defend them and what they do. Don't roll over on command, and don't punish them for being human beings. And no, this ain't aimed at CCP.
Keep pretending you care about EVE ISBoxers and not just their money, Lax.
Come hang out with us in the channel "Isboxers Lounge" and discuss fittings, doctrines, or just shoot the breeze. Unlike the forums, we won't ban you for what you say. IGN: "AayJay Crendraven" and "Nolak Ataru".
So on the off chance that he'd read it. I sent Corebloodbrother a mail asking for a sit down in a neutral place either here or in-game to talk about why he pushed CCP, or a simple response. Gonna see what he says.
Wanna earn your customer's respect? Go to bat for them. Defend them and what they do. Don't roll over on command, and don't punish them for being human beings. And no, this ain't aimed at CCP.
Keep pretending you care about EVE ISBoxers and not just their money, Lax.
Come hang out with us in the channel "Isboxers Lounge" and discuss fittings, doctrines, or just shoot the breeze. Unlike the forums, we won't ban you for what you say. IGN: "AayJay Crendraven" and "Nolak Ataru".
well, not all of us dodge
m
Connect With Us