Close
Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 12 ... LastLast
Showing results 11 to 20 of 124
  1. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Fremantle, Western Australia
    Posts
    406

    Default

    Man that's disapointing, just as I was gearing up to get back into boxing.

  2. #12

    Default

    Makes sense to me that if they don't want (or make it hard) multiboxers in BG's that they don't want multiboxers in a central pvp zone either. But one could see this coming from miles away after previous dev statements ('multiboxing is fun for the guy doing it but not for the ones on the receiving end', etc ... ).

    But ye, same thing like before: couple guys running around with their own invincible army and eventually it affects all other < 5 boxers.
    Last edited by zenga : 09-19-2014 at 06:58 AM
    Everything that is fun in life is either bad for your health, immoral or illegal!

  3. #13

    Default

    Meh, melee is king. Dont need follow for that

    If they dont add an afk/kick it will end up being a cluster fuck anyways, with or without 10-25+ boxers
    Last edited by Fat Tire : 09-19-2014 at 09:00 AM

  4. #14

    Default

    I'd argue this is more of a concession to bots than anything else.

    When they originally removed /follow from battlegrounds they said it was to get rid of bots. Really it only gets rid of shitty, most-obvious bots, and multiboxers. I'm sure they could pretty much care less if multiboxers are in battlegrounds, if it weren't for random complaints and people referring to multiboxed toons as "bots". I don't think they're really that concerned about less obvious bots -- as I said back in 2007 when I was working with Blizzard's Warden (anti-cheat) on a regular basis and knee-deep in the legal BS between Blizzard and Glider, "quite frankly, if a cheater does not appear to be cheating to the other players, then clearly no harm is done to the game". I can't speak for them obviously but I personally met and talked to various members of the Warden/Risk team at Blizzard and they didn't exactly disagree with my statements from the time. (They did, however, say that Prepared running so many accounts would become a problem for multiboxers.)

    So instead of spending their time and energy dealing with the actual bot problem, they're taking the route of reducing the number of characters who appear to be cheating to the other players. This is a much easier and less costly solution for them, especially considering that with respect to Warden and detecting bots running on players' PCs, their hands are somewhat tied! (They can't implement scans that are particularly invasive, and bots are pretty good at hiding from them.) One of the only remaining defenses they have is legal, and with bot developers not in the US (say, "for the sake of example", in Germany) the legal team also has their hands somewhat tied.

    The practical effect of this is that the more human-looking bots become more effective, and the profits of said bot developers is increased (people have to use those bots instead of the shitty ones) -- and there is the concession to bot developers. Blizzard is, blatantly I would say, choosing these bots over multiboxers.

    And I am certain that many people who would otherwise be multiboxing and following the rules, will be botting instead and violating them. In this scenario, that is a win for Blizzard.

    They have to rely too much on player reports, and they're effectively reducing those. Meanwhile, they can say they're doing something about the bot problem, they can still show that they are banning people (a la reports), and they can still rake in cash from selling accounts and subscriptions to a pretty sizable population of botters who are often happy to repurchase the game.

    Long story short, I don't think that cancelling your multiboxed accounts will affect change on this issue. They will make that money back from botters -- a much larger population than multiboxers. However, we could maybe put together a formal legal complaint in a civil court to argue the issue, and maybe in the process force them to confirm in public records that they are not doing what they claim to be doing against bots.
    Lax
    Author of ISBoxer
    Video: ISBoxer Quick Start

  5. #15
    Old Man Vecter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    436
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    I think at this point cancelling accounts isn't the best course of action. Ask questions and plead our case in a professional manner during this beta phase. If it ends up being a final decision come launch then take those measures.

    We need to voice our opinions on twitter, the forums, etc. Let them know in such an environment disabling /follow makes little sense unless of course it is truly pointed at multiboxers and not bots.

    Please don't whine, make your case, state the facts and have GOOD discussions about this.
    Computer Freak Social Geek

    GET OFF MY LAWN!

  6. #16
    Member luxlunae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    1431
    Blog Entries
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zenga View Post
    But ye, same thing like before: couple guys running around with their own invincible army and eventually it affects all other < 5 boxers.
    Yup

  7. #17

    Default

    a simple follow bot has no great use here as they would not invite you to a group. and honor would suck as a lot it comes off killing players/npc u have to target
    same for the world bossess to get the loot box's you need to do DMG/heal a target hiting to the boss not just be in the zone.

    forgot to say the zone "used" to be classed as a battleground where anything you could no do a bg you could not do here this got taken out so but it might just be a bug to to changes and the bg rules will get put back in as mass res works there now. Soultrader is still broken in real bg's.
    Last edited by ebony : 09-19-2014 at 10:36 AM




  8. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vecter View Post
    We need to voice our opinions on twitter, the forums, etc.
    I'll chime in if someone starts a post - I'm pretty terrible at expressing myself in a way that makes sense to other people that aren't me.
    Multiboxing since WoW:BC - MY YOUTUBE!

  9. #19
    Old Man Vecter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    436
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xixillia View Post
    I'll chime in if someone starts a post - I'm pretty terrible at expressing myself in a way that makes sense to other people that aren't me.
    http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/14527272635#1

    Let's keep it civil, show your support!
    Computer Freak Social Geek

    GET OFF MY LAWN!

  10. #20

    Default

    Thanks vecter. If you have a beta US account please weigh in. Need all the support we can get I think.

    http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/14527272635#1
    Multiboxing since WoW:BC - MY YOUTUBE!

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •